OmniQEC
Discovering practical quantum error-correcting codes by an AI scientist
Ge Yan, Shanchuan Li, Pengyue Ma, Qixin Zhang, Pingchuan Ma, Jianping Wang, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Yuxuan Du
Background
A code is practical only if it works on real hardware, and that depends jointly on its structure, the processor, syndrome extraction and decoding, demands that often conflict.
OmniQEC is an AI scientist for this search. An LLM-based orchestrator coordinates code generation, code-level screening, syndrome-extraction synthesis and decoder-based circuit evaluation in a two-speed loop: a fast loop screens many candidates with inexpensive code-level proxies, and a slow loop evaluates the promising ones at the circuit level and feeds the results back into the search.
- Against BB codes
- [[72,12,6]] · [[144,12,12]]
- Both outperformed at complete-implementation budgets of 98 and 240 physical qubits.
- Scaling
- Better with budget
- Logical-error suppression improves as the physical-qubit budget grows.
- Search
- 14
- Physical-qubit budgets per LLM backend, across four qLDPC families and three backends.